THE IMPACT OF SUCCESSIVE LEGAL SYSTEMS ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN IRAQ

Abstract

This article aims to assess the effect of successive legal systems on administrative decision-making in Iraq. Particularly, it examines how these legal systems influence decision-making and their implications for individual rights and freedoms. Given its law-oriented nature, this article employs a qualitative, analytic research methodology. It is based on laws, constitutions, textbooks, journals, newspaper reports and case law. It identifies administrative decisions, laws, and other measures and then conducts a rigorous analysis. A key finding is that successive legal systems have endowed the ruling authorities with extensive administrative decision-making power, which these authorities have retained despite the development of Iraq's legal systems. Therefore, it is suggested that the new legal system's decision-making process be governed by the principle of legality and the rule of law. Further, the principle of legality contributes decisively to maintaining a balance between individual rights and the rule of law. Additionally, it activates the principle of separation of powers, ensuring that each body performs its function under the applicable constitution.