A comparative study of the status of the perfect human being from the perspective of Mulla Sadra and Kant

Abstract

Aristotle called man a “rational animal." Ibn Arabi has called it the "divine joke" and "the Majma Al-Bahrain" (The great Multiplicity (barrier) of the world of unity and Multiplicity) for the manifestation of the divine spirit and the merciful Breath in the physical body of this creature. Mulla Sadra, in order to influence Ibn Arabi in establishing, explaining and promoting his philosophical-mystical school, also considers man as a divine caliph with a comprehensive description. He denies the unity of a kind of human being and proves the plurality of a kind of every human being, He is considered to be of various kinds according to his esoteric intoxication. He did not set a specific limit for him and has infinite potential for promotion. Immanuel Kant believes that everything - even God and the universe - makes sense to man. And in his view, man, in order to have the inherent dignity that underlies his moral system and practical intellect, it can be promoted and developed to the point of attaining perfection and infinite happiness. Mulla Sadra and Kant with two different bases But a single goal, they have explained the process of human development and how to crystallize his talents.