Inter relationships between Criminal Liability and Tort Liability

Abstract

The importance of the subject under study is reflected in the importance of responsibility in general, as a method that gives dynamism and effectiveness to legal texts, especially tort liability, whose nature has been tainted by some ambiguity as a result of assuming a specific purpose for it, which is reparation for damage, and as a result of the inability to compatibility between this supposed goal, and the violation of what is hoped for Responsibility, and not only desired, but constitutes an integrated system with the nature and nature of responsibility, and an appropriate descriptive of the act on which it is based and its supposed breadth, so that the goal is achieved only by describing the error, which in turn remained controversial in its content and pillars, and its achievement of justice in particular. For the injured and proportionate to reparation.

This research aimed to achieve the following results:

1- The Jordanian Council was more expansive than some legislations when it did not indicate the level of family relationship necessary to obtain a wage in return for moral damage.

2- The privilege of the reward for moral damage in the Jordanian law does not transfer to the beneficiaries unless it has been settled or granted by the last judicial ruling, and its disbursement in these two cases does not require the beneficiaries in an unusual arrangement.