Pain Management Strategies in Nursing

Abstract

In the second phase, a digital questionnaire was devised to gauge the perceived regularity and effectiveness of various strategies. Content from the PAIN-SP scale was showcased to an independent cohort of professionally trained nurses at the baccalaureate, masters, and doctorate levels who were actively engaged in clinical practice. These practitioners offered insights regarding the clarity and pertinence of the material in relation to their professional duties, triggering adjustments. These revised iterations underwent a trial run with the same demographic, followed by further refinements. Subsequently, the PAIN-SP scale was subjected to an additional pilot test among the designated demographic: nurses who provide care for adult patients in high-acuity environments. A structured critique of the tool ensued and is elucidated in the subsequent segments.

In the initial step, behavioral markers for five pain relief tactics, previously elaborated in the American Nurses Association (ANA) protocols, were pinpointed. These protocols underline the essential process of evaluation, intervention, and reevaluation to maintain or enhance patient well-being. Embedded within each tactic is a sequence of evaluation, corresponding relief measures, and follow-up assessments. Dual Delphi inquiries were executed to ascertain both the relevance and lucidity for the nursing cadre. Seasoned nursing specialists and active nurse practitioners offered their evaluations and commentary until a collective agreement was formulated.

This empirical, quantitative study sought to evaluate the practicality of the Pain Management Strategies in Nursing Practice (PAIN-SP) scale. The tool, meticulously designed to chronicle the frequency and perceived potency of pain relief approaches employed by nurses in the treatment of hospitalized adults confronting medical issues that necessitate pain and discomfort management, was put to the test.